UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA WOMEN’S BASKETBALL NEWSLETTER – DECEMBER 2010

To join the newsletter visit our website each month for a copy.

The following is excerpt from Cory Dodds of The Academy of Sports Leadership:

Over the past decade I have watched many coaches in action and have detected a distinct difference between two dominant leadership styles. There are many ways to describe the leadership habits of coaches, but it appears to me that as leaders most fall into two categories—either drivers or builders. Drivers tend to be what leadership experts refer to as transactional leaders while builders fall pretty naturally into the category of transformational leaders. Drivers and builders have two very different leadership mind-sets and skill sets.

Drivers are generally after impressive achievements, especially the attainment of fame, status, popularity, or power. Not that there is anything wrong with that, as Jerry Seinfeld would say. But builders know that when success just means wealth, fame, status, and power it doesn‘t last and usually isn‘t satisfying. Builders commit to their calling and believe that people really do matter. For them, significance is found in contributing to the lives of their players.

Coaching is a major factor in any athlete‘s success. Most players recognize this. They‘ve been coached since they were tots playing in youth leagues. And for the most part they‘ve believed in and trusted their coaches. However, many adults reveal years later that they learned little from coaches they encountered in their student-athletic experience. Generally, the coaches that fail to impact student-athletes are transactional leaders.

Drivers / Dominant Leadership Style: Transactional

« Put results first. Relationships are subordinate to results, a means to an end.

« Make the decisions. Drivers like being decisive and in control. Drivers set the agenda.

« Possess a controlling spirit. They feel if they can control people, they’ll maintain absolute authority.

« Resort to more regulations. Drivers use rule and regulations to enforce compliance. Drivers want things done their way.

« Crack the whip. Drivers keep pressure on. Come down hard when goals aren’t attained.

« Take a short-term focus. Drivers tend to focus on the day’s or week’s results.

« Focus on “what” have you done for me lately? Enough said.

« Get “in your face.” Drivers thrive on confrontation. “My way or the highway”.

« Are more critical than positive. Drivers find it difficult to accentuate the positive.

« Power trip. Fear giving away power. Empowering student-athletes to become team leaders is not a priority.

« Span of vision. Concern is for results today regardless of costs tomorrow.

Builders / Dominant Leadership Style: Transformative

« Put people first. Relationships are priorities to producing results.

« Stress team capabilities. Builders want to build systems and talent.

« Get others involved. Builders seek input from other coaches and value input from players.

« Let solutions emerge. Builders don’t try to tackle every problem knowing that some problems solve themselves.

« Take a long-term focus. Builders assemble players, programs, and processes.

« Are mission driven. It’s the mission that sets the priorities.

« Are servant leaders. What’s my contribution?  Builders possess a mental model stimulated by a “What can I contribute to the lives of my players” approach to leading.

« Embrace empowerment. Builders work to prepare others for leadership roles.

« Support identity of team. No two teams will ever be the same. Builders see value in the diversity of personalities.

« Vision is the main course, not an appetizer. Builders weigh the costs of today’s decisions on tomorrow growth and development.

31 Pages of clinic notes, with diagrams from the October 2010 Vanderbilt Coaches Clinic.  Many drills, conditioning and other good things here.

PRINTABLE VERSION HERE

Enjoy!

*I have switched over to Google Docs for file transfer.  One follower has mentioned some difficulty in accessing link.  Should you have any issues with downloads, please email me directly at:  ideas@allbasketballreview.com and I will send you .pdf directly.  Thank you!

This clinic was shared by Coach Scott Allen of Paul VI High School in Fairfax, VA.  Coach Allen is a great source of information and we appreciate his willingness to share.  PLEASE send any sharing items you have to the above email address.  Sharing in our profession is the greatest way to improve.  Any coach who shares an item with AllBasketballReview will receive FREE shipping on any book, DVD or eBook from our collection.

Bill Walsh on facing adversity…

To deal with and overcome adversity, several personal attributes are required.

By degree, you must possess all of the following elements:

• An inner confidence that has been tested.

• Sound fundamentals and skills that have been firmly entrenched by weeks, months and years of training, practice, rehearsal and direct competition.

• A functional intellect for the activity.

• A belief—a conviction—that is able to effectively control your urge to “quit and run.”

• A willingness to sacrifice for others.

• A refined sense of communication that enable you to have a realistic sense of what your teammates are thinking and how they will react and respond to a given situation.

• Trust in yourself and in your teammates. This trust must have been nurtured through months and years of practicing, playing and sacrificing for a common goal.

• A philosophy, a scheme, and a system that has evolved, matured and become established.

• Flexibility and adaptability that enable you to effectively deal with change. You must be able to recognize and adapt to markedly different styles, strategies and tactics.

• A qualified support staff and system. Both your staff and your system must reflect a high level of intensity and a comparable level of willingness to make critical sacrifices

• Both elements must be well-organized and well-led.

• Leadership.

• A plan, a goal and a dominating thought process that motivates and inspires.

• A knowledge and understanding of your opponent—his strategies, tactics, system, personnel, attitudes and goals.

• A system of replacing and acquiring new players and staff members.

From “Finding The Winning Edge” by Bill Walsh

Contents:

1. Larry Shyatt, Florida – Introduction
2. Brad Stevens, Butler – Defensive Principals
3. Del Harris, Texas Legends – Today’s Game
4. Gary Parrish, CBS Sports – Reporter’s Perspective
5. Jamie Dixon (Pitt), Matthew Driscoll (Florida), Shaka Smart (VCU) – Special Situations
6. Buzz Williams, Marquette – Program Organization
7. LuAnn Humphrey, NCAA Enforcement (Director)
8. Kevin Eastman, Boston Celtics – NBA Defense & More
9. Travis Ford (Oklahoma State), Shaka Smart (VCU), Brendan Suhr (NBA) – Finding and Coaching Your Team Leader / Coaching the Modern Player
10. Matt Painter, Purdue – Motion Offense
11. John Costigan, iPad Application
12. Spencer Wood, Ice Box Athlete – Mental Toughness in the Clutch
13. Larry Greer (Trailblazers) and Charles Klask (Magic) – Advance Scouting
14. Billy Donovan, Florida – Preparing to become a head coach

I recently read Dan Tudor’s evaluation of Snail Mail vs. the world of Digital Media.  It’s safe to assume that everyone follows Dan and has visited his site, but the the record… check it out – it’s worth it.  Whether you agree or disagree with him, there is enough stuff there to at least make you think.

I wanted to take it a step further and add to his points.

With Fall recruiting nearly over (I am hearing many sighs of relief right now!) how are you going to follow it all up?  Email?  Facebook?  Hand written notes? Faxes? Twitter?   All of the above?

I’m an old-school recruiter.  I have always believed that a handwritten letter, though more cumbersome and time consuming, are of great value and worth the effort.  The physical act for the prospect of walking to the mailbox, removing all the letters, deciding on which one to open first, opening it, holding it, reading it and deciding what to do with it all stimulates an emotional experience for the reader.  All the technology, Social Media and networking options are vital, but not at the expense of writing someone a handwritten note on your school’s stationary.  It also doesn’t command the emotional attachment that a letter does.

Take for example this scenario.  How many of you have sent an email and had the meaning misinterpreted?  Everyone.  How many times has that happened with a hand written note?  Almost never.  Why?  Studies say there is something about the physical nature of paper, the actual look of the hand writing, how it feels in the person’s hand and smells that attaches itself emotionally to the reader and helps convey the message and meaning better than the computer, phone or PDA screen.

Over the past few years the evolution in the recruiting thought process has been: these kids mainly communicate through PDA’s, Social Media and networking, etc… I better get on it and on it fast.  You’re right.

There is no question about that.  Do it.  Get on the technology, understand it and use it.  If you don’t – you are behind.  Technology, such as Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook make interacting with recruits a lot easier and very effective.  Name one of your recruits without a PDA or cell phone.  Is there one?  Email has become secondary and in many cases obsolete.  I conducted an informal survey / test.  While at an event I had a third person send an email to a prospect in plain site of the two of us asking them to call the third person.  I watched.  Then I had the same person “Facebook” them and ask them to call.  10+ seconds later… the prospect called.  When asked why they called… because “You Facebooked me.”  When asked if they checked/got their email… they replied, “I never check email anymore.”   When asked if they got email on their PDA they responded, “sure.”  WOW!… Is email outdated already?  I don’t think so, but it’s not as effective as it once was.

Personally watching the prospect I witnessed it unfold before my eyes.  The prospect never budged on the email “buzz”, but immediately checked the Facebook hit.  In repeating this test over and over, the resounding result was the same.  Even more, mail has made a come back and replaced email in many situations.

I’d also beware of the Facebook trap in recruiting.  To many, me included, it’s a little creepy.  Friending 15 – 18 year old prospects for the adult recruiter is very touchy.  Especially in women’s basketball or any other women’s sport for that matter.  Personally, I’ve never gone the Facebook route for that reason.  I wouldn’t want recruiters Facebooking with my child (son or daughter), I’m not going to do it with some one elses.

If you are going to use Facebook I would discuss this in great detail amongst your staff and get on the same page with what everyone is comfortable with.  Decide on what and how it will be used.  Also, see if your department/university has a policy or concerns with the use of Facebook in recruiting.  Understand the NCAA bylaws governing it’s use.   First rule: speak to the prospect’s parents.  Make sure they are comfortable with it and want it to happen.  Don’t assume it is different for male prospects than female prospects.  That is the trap.

A recent study will give coaches who still love the look and feel of the good ‘ol fashioned recruiting letter some good news:

Mail outranks electronic media when it comes to some important areas.

Physical media, such as recruiting letters and other creative materials, caused more emotional processing in the brains of those tested.   The same physical media left a deeper footprint in the minds of the recipients.

The bottom line of the study, which you can read in full here, is that physical mail and media seems more “real” to the reader.  That’s an important fact to pay attention to because the areas of the brain that are engaged during this processing are some of the places that make the deepest impact when it comes to our emotional connection with the sender.

There are some really effective ideas that are NCAA compliant that you should consider when it comes to making the most out of your snail mail recruiting:

1. Pay attention to the stock and quality of the paper you use.  The study seems to indicate that the weight, brightness, and other quality factors are noticed by the reader.  For example, what if you wrote about wanting to talk to your recruit about an offer, and did so on a heavier card stock?  The look and feel of the paper you use helps to underscore the message you’re talking to them about.
2. Since paper registers deeper with our emotions, save your more emotional messages for the printed page. Things like your vision for your program, an official invitation to campus…the messages regarding the things you believe to be at the heart of the prospects decision.
3. Get creative with your envelope. Does an envelope need to be an envelope?  Get your compliance office to approve everything first, but think outside the box on this one.  When a prospect receives 20+ pieces a mail a day – what makes them decide which letter to pick up first.  First impressions matter, even more so with your envelope.

Any good, well structured recruiting communication system must contain all forms of electronic communication, hand written communication, phone calls and faxes and be well thought out and organized.

I believe it is dangerous to move totally away from hand written mail and solely into the digital age.  Balance, creativity, organization and consistency is the key.

It’s an easy lesson:  Do what is right, not what is easy.  After you lose a recruit, it is impossible to push the rewind button and do it all over adding in things you left out the first time.  You never know what it will be that helps put your program over the top for any given prospect.  It won’t be any one thing every time.  Stay omnipresent to cues your are getting back.  Diversify your recruiting portfolio and give yourself a broader foundation for potential success.

Today’s Play Of the Day comes from a slight variation of a drill I watched the other day at the University of Virginia Men’s Basketball workout.  I added some terminology I am used to, but the teaching principals and structure were the same.

Coach Bennett and his staff do such a fantastic job of teaching all the little, fundamental details.

Even with coaching at Virginia for four years and I am still amazed every time I walk into the John Paul Jones Arena… it’s simply fabulous.

This drill is a half court defensive drill, 4 on 3.

4 on 3 w/ Trailer

The “recruiting” aspect of the Final Four… college guys hanging with AAU guys to solidify the relationship for X player took over and the time for X’s & O’s was prioritized out of the equation.  Everyone said, “We have to do that again.”  It never happens.

Kudos to Coach Shyatt and the Florida staff for keeping it alive and growing the game in a way outside of recruiting.  As they said, the reason why many of us got into it in the first place.

This was a good article on what the clinic is truly all about.

Florida clinic not your usual coaches camp — thankfully

From Gary Parrish…

First thing Monday morning, and Larry Shyatt is standing on the men’s court inside the Florida basketball practice facility, welcoming those who have assembled on this SEC campus to talk hoops in what feels like a genuine and pure environment. There is nothing glamorous here. A white board on the court, folding chairs lining a baseline and sideline, and little more. The room is filled with everybody from future Hall of Famers to junior college coaches, and Shyatt, Billy Donovan’s associate head coach at Florida, has just one instruction before turning things over to Butler’s Brad Stevens.

Matt Painter shares information about the motion offense he has perfected over at Purdue. (Courtesy: Gary Parrish)

“No holding back,” Shyatt said. “If you’re not willing to share, this is not for you.”

What happened next was nice to witness.

The subsequent 14 hours featured one speaker after another — Stevens, NBA icon Del Harris, Pittsburgh coach Jamie Dixon, Boston Celtics assistant Kevin Eastman, etc., — talking about a variety of subjects, exchanging ideas, discussing, debating and thoroughly enjoying a two-day clinic Shyatt created years ago that continues today thanks to the support of Florida athletic director Jeremy Foley and the willingness of those invited to make time to attend. They talked about transition defense and motion offense, about mental toughness and proper shooting techniques. They talked about how to deal with certain situations in the media, how to handle players who won’t work, what to do with student-athletes’ sometimes embarrassing addiction to Facebook and Twitter, and then they went to bed, awoke early Tuesday, and did it all again.

This was not about getting an all-expense paid trip to Florida to visit the beach, enjoy Disney World, play golf, gamble in a casino, or hit the hottest nightspot. Time (and energy) permitting, maybe some enjoyed a couple of beers with colleagues at the Ale House near the hotel one night, but that’s it. This invitation-only event was and always has been exclusively about basketball for guys who describe themselves as basketball junkies. There is no recruiting or public relations advantage to be gained. Just knowledge, if you’re willing to take it.

“A lot of the coaching clinics have you talking to high school coaches and junior college coaches, and even though you’re teaching the game and giving something back to the game, what you’re really doing is recruiting and public relations,” said Purdue coach Matt Painter, who spent nearly two hours Tuesday talking about the motion offense he learned as a kid growing up in Indiana and has darn-near perfected as a rising star in the Big Ten. “But this clinic is different. It’s just an exchange of ideas — coaches passing knowledge back and forth and trying to help each other, and I think that’s what’s great. This is what you get in it for, to coach and have fun and get better and help other guys get better.”

Sadly, there are a diminishing number of opportunities for such. Like Painter pointed out, many coaching clinics these days are run — either officially or unofficially — by summer coaches or other figures connected to prospects as a money-making endeavor. (I (Parrish) wrote about one such event last year.) They’re mostly built around a guy who invites every college coach recruiting his top prospect to speak at his clinic, then turns around and charges high school coaches — and anybody else who wants to watch stars of the sport in an intimate setting — hundreds of dollars to attend the clinic.

Will accepting an invitation to speak guarantee you the prospect?

Of course not.

But passing on the invitation will almost certainly eliminate you.

So coaches fly into various cities and stand in small gyms or meeting rooms and talk about whatever, and the person or people in charge get a nice little payday. That’s a typical coaching clinic in the year 2010 (though, it should be noted, the NCAA is trying to eliminate the practice, and the Basketball Focus Group actually caused the cancellation of at least one such clinic this spring.)

I tell you all that to tell you this: Shyatt’s clinic is different.

In fact, he actually invited NCAA enforcement director LuAnn Humphrey to speak.

She did so Monday night.

“The opportunities to do this are rare, but the interest and intent is not,” said former Georgia coach Dennis Felton, a longtime attendee. “People would be surprised to know that this is what basketball coaches are really like. Our image gets so skewed because of all the nonsense that goes on. But when it gets down to it, if we had our way we would just like to be basketball coaches and leaders and mentors.”

How frustrating is it that the sport no longer allows that at the highest level?

“Very frustrating,” Felton answered. “I’ve always estimated that the time we really spend on coaching is 10 percent. We get to spend such a tiny fraction of our time on actual basketball, and we spend all our other time trying to control all the other stuff, and that’s the stuff that’s the hardest to control.

“[College basketball] is in a bad state, but that’s why this clinic is good,” Felton added. “We all cherish the opportunity to spend all these hours over two days on development and on getting better. It’s a great time. It’s the best.”

Perseverance pays off for student manager

Steve Megargee
Rivals.com College Basketball

With the confidence of a coach and the passion of a preacher, Zach Lipson has spent much of his teenage years telling anyone he meets about his plans to join one of the nation’s elite college basketball programs.

It didn’t matter to him that he’d never played a minute of organized hoops. Or that he stood little chance of ever being more than 4 feet tall. He still gave the same speech to just about everyone he met, whether he was chatting at a dinner table full of strangers or sitting across from a skeptical guidance counselor.

He was born with a spinal deformity, so he already had overcome long odds. What was to stop this Nashville resident from proving people wrong once again?

Zachary Lipson's passion has him headed to Kentucky as part of the basketball program.

Lipson’s story proved inspirational enough to earn him a spot as a student-manager at Kentucky. He is expected to live at Wildcat Lodge – the same building that houses the players.

That represents a stunning turn of events for someone who has overcome more obstacles in his 19 years than most people face in their lives.

Lipson was born eight weeks premature and weighed less than 2 pounds. He required CPR in the delivery room. He has undergone more than 30 surgeries. And if that weren’t enough to make him curse fate, Lipson also has a twin brother who is healthy. Lipson doesn’t need to wonder what might have been: He has a walking reminder in his home.

Lipson has resisted the temptation of self-pity. He instead has faced every challenge with the same upbeat approach that has helped him serve as an inspiration to friends, family members and classmates. Kentucky’s latest recruit won’t develop into the next Tony Delk, but he just might become the next Tony Robbins.

That represents a stunning turn of events for someone who has overcome more obstacles in his 19 years than most people face in their lives.

Lipson was born eight weeks premature and weighed less than 2 pounds. He required CPR in the delivery room. He has undergone more than 30 surgeries. And if that weren’t enough to make him curse fate, Lipson also has a twin brother who is healthy. Lipson doesn’t need to wonder what might have been: He has a walking reminder in his home.

Lipson has resisted the temptation of self-pity. He instead has faced every challenge with the same upbeat approach that has helped him serve as an inspiration to friends, family members and classmates. Kentucky’s latest recruit won’t develop into the next Tony Delk, but he just might become the next Tony Robbins.

“I wouldn’t be the speaker I am today without my deformities,” Lipson said. “I’ve used them to make myself a stronger human being. That’s a very radical idea. That’s how I want to be an inspiration to people.

“I want to tell people you don’t have to fall and beat yourself up over your problems. You can take them and help them make you stronger. You can turn a losing situation into a winning situation.”

Born to inspire

He wasn’t always this upbeat. Lipson remembers being teased by grade-school classmates who didn’t know any better, and he occasionally would look at his brother and wonder why he couldn’t be blessed with a healthy body.

	Former Vanderbilt star Drew Maddux calls Zachary Lipson a student assistant coach.

The turning point came when he was in first grade. Lipson, a devout Christian, had an epiphany. He was in a hospital room when he started to understand how he could make the most of his situation.

“I learned humility at that point in my life,” Lipson said. “I realized my true purpose here on Earth is to share the gospel, to share my story and to be an inspiration to people.”

That’s when it dawned on Lipson that he wouldn’t get to live an average life. He was being called to do much, much more. He would tell his story to anyone who would listen. He doesn’t consider anyone a stranger.

“I noticed when we go to places, if we were sitting at a table, he’d end up not sitting at our table,” said Lipson’s mother, Susan. “He’d be sitting at a table with people who he didn’t even know. He’d get to know them, talk to them, encourage them. They’d say, ‘Wow, what an amazing story. I can’t believe what he’s been through.’ ”

He eventually found a way to spread his message through sports. Lipson grew up hating athletics because his health problems prevented him from playing organized sports or from joining his classmates in playground activities. His attitude changed after he took over as a student-manager for the football team at Christ Presbyterian Academy, the Nashville school he attends.

He caught on so well that he also became the student-manager for the basketball and soccer teams. And he made himself into the best manager a school could possibly have.

When a coach wanted him to do something during a game, Lipson would sprint to wherever he needed to be. He commanded such respect that CPA basketball coach Drew Maddux never called Lipson a manager and instead labeled him a “student assistant coach.”

“He’s like one of my sons,” said Maddux, who played basketball for Vanderbilt from 1994-98. “I’ve really grown to love Zach.”

Not only did Lipson perform the typical managerial responsibilities of fetching water and collecting equipment, he also gave locker-room speeches and even assisted Maddux in advance scouting.

Lipson’s pep talks were so legendary in the Nashville high school ranks that officials at rival school David Lipscomb High asked him to give an inspirational speech to their entire student body.

Bleeding blue

Lipson fell in love with his manager jobs so much that he wanted to continue on what he considered the best and biggest stage of all – the University of Kentucky. But he considered this goal more than just a dream; he saw it as his destiny.

“People describe me as a passionate person,” Lipson said. “I have such a love of life. What better basketball program than the University of Kentucky, which has so much tradition and passion? I think that’s what was drawing me there.”  Lipson speaks with the authority of someone twice his age. He’s a history enthusiast who has treasured the opportunity to visit more than 25 countries. He’s teaching himself to read and write in Russian. How many other teenagers would discuss leadership by referring to Napoleon’s attack in the Siege of Toulon?

But for all his obvious intelligence, Lipson still lacked the necessary grades and test scores to get into Kentucky as an out-of-state student. In fact, when he mentioned his goal to a college counselor, she indicated that wasn’t a realistic possibility.

“She said he needed to look at Plan B,” Susan Lipson said. “Well, there was no Plan B for him. I saw how he took his knuckles, gripped his chair and said, ‘I will go to Kentucky.’ ”

Lipson did everything in his power to improve his grades. He spent his lunch hour studying in his school’s locker room and took countless hours of ACT preparatory courses. All that extra work allowed him to qualify academically. Then, a remarkable chain of events brought his goal within reach.

Kentucky fired former coach Billy Gillispie after the 2008-09 season and replaced him with John Calipari, who in turn hired Martin Newton as the school’s director of basketball operations. Maddux’s father, Ray, and Newton’s father, former Vanderbilt basketball coach and Kentucky athletic director C.M. Newton, were friends and had helped found “The Rebounders,” a club for former Vanderbilt basketball lettermen.

In addition, before being hired at Kentucky, Martin Newton had worked for Nike alongside Tim Thompson, a former Vanderbilt player and one of Maddux’s closest friends.

Maddux used his connections to get Lipson an opportunity to work at Kentucky’s basketball camps last summer. Lipson wasted no time making a name for himself with his work habits and his indefatigable spirit.

“I had never been to Lexington,” Lipson said. “I didn’t know anyone. I was a little … not shy but a little afraid and nervous because I’d never been to the campus before. But I worked, helped out in the team camps and put my name out there.”

Lipson apparently made quite an impact. Kentucky utilizes about six to eight student-managers each season and annually receives at least 50 applications for those positions. Lipson’s application stood out.

“Zach’s story is a unique one, not only because of what he’s overcome in life but also because of his passion for Kentucky basketball,” Newton said. “This is a young man who absolutely loves University of Kentucky basketball. He lives in Nashville. His mentor is Drew Maddux, a guy who played at Vanderbilt. Yet it never squelched his passion for Kentucky basketball.

“The combination of the type of person he is, the things he’s overcome and his passion for Kentucky made it a really easy choice.”

Student-managers are an integral part of just about every program across the country, but that’s particularly true at Kentucky, where longtime equipment manager Bill Keightley played such a vital role that an honorary jersey in his name hangs from the Rupp Arena rafters.

The student-managers work the same hours as the players. They’re present for team practices and weightlifting sessions as well as participating in more menial activities such as laundry duty.

Lipson is ready to perform these tasks to the best of his ability, but he also believes he can offer something extra. He wants to encourage Kentucky’s players and his fellow classmates the same way he has inspired just about everyone else he has met.

“The biggest thing I’m looking forward to is working with people,” Lipson said. “I feel like I’m going to be a big impact in their lives. I’m going to influence the way they think and look at things. I can show someone a positive influence.”

And if Calipari ever needs someone to help out with a pep talk, he won’t have far to look. He need only turn to his new manager, who can go into painstaking detail on how various financial moguls made their fortunes or discuss the personal traits that caused Winston Churchill to succeed and Adolf Hitler to fail.

Better yet, he simply can tell the story about his improbable path to Lexington.

By Dana O’Neil  ESPN.com

The image of college basketball has taken a beating in recent years, with rumors, murmurs and innuendo about cheating spreading like wildfire. Cynics believe no one is trying to follow the NCAA rulebook and that the game has fallen victim to the begging hands of agents, runners and hangers-on looking to collect on the next NBA star.

Is it that bad? What are the real problems? And is the NCAA doing enough to fix those problems?

To get the answers, ESPN.com went to the sources. During the EYBL Peach Jam last week, we interviewed 20 high-profile head coaches, representing each of the six power conferences. With the promise of full anonymity, we asked them to tell the truth about their sport.

And they did.

What is your least favorite part of summer recruiting?

No one likes the constant travel, the bad basketball and the emphasis on individual skills instead of team play.

Coaches travel everywhere to watch high school kids in July, but can’t keep an eye on their own.

But of the coaches surveyed, many — eight of the 20 — cited the time away from campus and their own players as the biggest problem with the summertime.

“I have my team over for a barbecue before I leave in July,” one coach said. “Little do they know it’s a farewell, not a welcome barbecue.”

“You walk into a living room and promise a mother that you’ll be there for her son,” said another. “And as soon as they get on campus, you’re gone.”

“They’re all on campus and I’m on the road,” added another. “If they do something stupid, I’m going to get fired — but I can’t be there to see what they’re doing.”

Some other popular grievances:

“What don’t I like? All of it. I don’t think there should be summer recruiting, period. They want to clean it up? Get rid of it.”

“I’ll tell you another problem — 70 percent of the kids we’re sitting here watching should be in summer school. They shouldn’t be here.”

“What don’t I like about summer? Everything. The babysitting, the ass-kissing. Does that cover it?”

If you could change, add or delete one rule in the NCAA Manual, what would it be?

Like the endless rulebook, the suggestions here were endless. In fact, there were so many opinions that it was impossible to get any sort of consensus.

One coach even offered a sweeping renovation: “All of it. Get rid of the whole thing. There are so many stupid rules in that thing that you can’t enforce. We need to throw it away.”

The hottest topics?

• April recruiting: In 2009, the NCAA board accepted a proposal from the Basketball Issues Committee to prevent college coaches from evaluating prospects in April, unless the prospects are on a high school, prep school or junior college campus. The idea was to keep high school kids in school.

“That passed with 60 percent of the vote,” one coach said. “Where are all those people who were in favor of eliminating it?”

Apparently overruled, because no one seems happy that the spring evaluation period essentially has been eliminated.

“They stopped it because they didn’t want the kids out of school,” one coach said. “Well, they’re still having the events, so why can’t we go?”

“Give me April and time in July off the road so I can be with my players,” another said, combining the two biggest complaints. “Everyone likes to talk about the APR [Academic Progress Rate] and they want to hold us accountable for the APR. Well, let me be on campus in the summer when my guys are getting started. Let me make sure they get off on the right foot.”

• Phone calls: In an age of immediate technology, most everyone agreed that the limit on phone calls was laughable, though there was one dissenter who said, “To me, your brain is like this [making a fist] and with enough phone calls to a kid, you can mold that brain by twisting it and turning it with the information.”

That coach, however, was a lone wolf screaming in the wind.

“Everyone has caller ID; everyone has unlimited texting. If you don’t want to talk to me, hit ignore. I hit ignore all the time.”

“I get a kick out of the phone calls. Who gets caught with that anymore? It’s a joke. They’re out there catching the guy with the one phone. How about the guy with two and three bat phones?”

While recruiting, coaches better keep their eye on the court and steer clear of the players.

• The so-called bump rule: Back in the day, summer league games ended with an on-court receiving line, with coaches lined up to glad-hand and talk to the prospects and their coaches.

It got so ridiculous that the NCAA decided to make the summer an evaluation-only period. That means no talking at all, as in no hello in a crowded hallway.

“We have the NCAA gestapettes around here like World Cup officials,” one coach said, referring to the NCAA representatives — most of whom are women — who monitor the summer circuit. “You smile at a kid, they give you a yellow card. Do it twice, it’s a red card and you’re off the road.”

How many of your peers do you trust?

Let’s put it this way: There is more honor in politics. Here’s the breakdown:

• Eight said flat-out no, they do not trust their peers.

“No, not at all. Maybe some of it is hearsay, but I don’t trust them at all.”

• Five said they trust fewer than 10 of their colleagues.

“How many? Five,” one coach said. Five percent? “No, five total,” he said. “And those five are my assistants.”

• Three said they actually have faith in their fellow coaches and trust “most.”

“I’d say 95 percent. There have been very few times in my career where someone did something absolutely underhanded to me. It’s happened, but not a lot.”

• One said 50 percent with a caveat.

“Half, but maybe I’m overly optimistic.”

• One dodged the question.

“That’s a loaded question. I think at heart, coaches are in it for the right reason. But I also know that everyone is trying to gain an advantage.”

• One evaded it.

“I would say I respect everybody because I know how hard they work.”

• One gave an answer within a non-answer.

College coaches generally play nice in public, but apparently don’t trust each other much privately.

“Well, everybody talks about you. You do this long enough, someone is going to say something bad about you. Last year someone said I didn’t go to practice.”

The one thing everyone agreed on: The lack of trust is disheartening.

“I would send my kid to play for seven coaches,” another said, before going on to name them. Those names, however, could compromise his identity, so they won’t be revealed here.

“It’s sad,” another coach said. “I grew up in this game with an idea of what I thought it was or what I thought it should be. Now I see it’s not like that at all. You have low- to mid-major guys aspiring to move up who will do anything to get there and you have guys who, once they get used to a certain lifestyle, will do whatever it takes to keep it.”

“There’s less of a brotherhood here than there is in football and that bothers me,” another added. “We have more guys stabbing each other in the back or using you guys [the media] to go after their agenda. That’s a big problem.”

How many programs do you think are committing major violations? Secondary? And why does no one snitch?

Here’s the silver lining for college basketball: Virtually every coach thinks that the majority of Division I programs are not intentionally breaking major rules. Of the 20, only four said 25 percent or more of the programs were, in the words of one coach, “committing felonies.”

“I had a question about e-mailing a kid and I asked another coach,” someone explained. “He thought we could; I thought we couldn’t. We both called our compliance directors and got two different answers.”

So why, then, do most people think college basketball is like the Wild Wild West, full of outlaws and renegades?

Backstabbing.

“Here’s what I think happens a lot — a team loses a kid to someone else and all of a sudden that someone else is cheating. Every time North Carolina loses a kid, someone else is cheating. It’s like there’s so much arrogance with them; they can’t believe someone would rather go somewhere else, so the other team has to be cheating.”

“I had a question about e-mailing a kid and I asked another coach. He thought we could; I thought we couldn’t. We both called our compliance directors and got two different answers.

Those who have been around the game the longest will tell you cheating has been going on as long as the game has been played.

“In the old days, the coaches had bird dogs. A guy would walk in a gym and you knew, ‘OK, he’s working for Frank McGuire; he’s working for Al McGuire.’ But funny enough, there was almost an honor in the fact that it was so out in the open. Now you don’t know who the bad guys are.”

Indeed, most everyone agrees that the cheaters have become far more nuanced. Gone are the days of the bags of money; in their place are people inventing ways to circumvent the meaning of a rule.

“I know guys help a kid get into a school that’s not really a school. Is it breaking a rule? Technically, no. Is it on the up and up? Absolutely not. I don’t think guys are climbing in windows and changing grades, but they are massaging things to make it easier for kids.”

“One of my players [who left early for the draft] was working out with another top-five draft pick,” a coach said. “They got to talking and my kid said something about not having money or whatever on campus. The other kid said, ‘My coach set up expense accounts all over town for me. Yours didn’t?”’

So with so much information on teams, why doesn’t anyone snitch?

“If you snitch, you’re Abar Rouse [the former Baylor assistant who taped the phone conversation with then-coach Dave Bliss and has since been ostracized from coaching]. That’s why no one talks. Plus, how do you prove it? I know stuff. I know stuff that is 100 percent happening right now, but the NCAA wants proof. How can I prove it?”

Which league is the cleanest? The dirtiest?

Congratulations, Jim Delany. Your league wins in a landslide. Of the 20 coaches surveyed, 11 said the Big Ten was the cleanest in the country. Three others cited the land where time stood still, also known as the scholarship-less Ivy League. (Although even the Ancient Eight earned one disparaging nod: “The Ivy League,” one coach said before pausing to add, “I mean the Ivy League a couple of years ago, before all of that stuff at Harvard.”)

But coaches cited the Big Ten’s perceived willingness to police itself and rosters that “made sense,” in which players traditionally come from the footprint of the schools they choose to attend.

“Look at Michigan State,” one coach said. “They’re there every year. When you see the dips, then you wonder. What happened? What didn’t happen? But a guy like Tom Izzo, he’s there every year because you know what his program is about and so do his players. There’s a consistency and an integrity.”

The SEC has made an effort to clean itself up, but its perception among coaches is still not favorable.

As for the dirtiest, despite Mike Slive’s best efforts to clean up the image, the Southeastern Conference was perceived as the worst, with three coaches partnering the SEC with the Big East and another tossing in the Big 12 (one coach went league-by-league, counting up schools). All in all, the SEC was named by 14 of the coaches.

“Oh no, it’s not just a myth,” one coach said about the SEC. “It’s the truth.”

Others weren’t so sure, however.

“Everyone says the SEC, but that’s because of [the] football thing,” said one coach. “That’s the standard answer, but I’m not sure it’s true.”

Added another: “The perception is the SEC doesn’t have a good reputation. I don’t know if that’s legit or fair. I was on the other side 10 years ago. If a program starts getting better, starts getting kids, the question is always the same: What’s he doing? He’s gotta be doing something. And that adds to the perception.”

One longtime coach said the image is slowly getting repaired.

“I do think by hiring guys like Anthony Grant at Alabama, the SEC is on the right track to cleaning things up.”

If you could land a top-five player but had to break a major rule to do it — knowing there was a zero percent chance of getting caught — would you?

This interesting ethical/moral question brought out a lot of interesting answers.

Only one coach hinted that he would consider it, asking: “Where am I in my career? It’s a risk-reward. If you’re at the beginning of your career or at the end of your contract, you might take the risk.”

And one other admitted, “Now would I break a minor rule? A secondary? Yes, absolutely.”

Everyone else said absolutely no way they would take the devil trade (though, naturally, everyone agreed that someone else would and has).

But here’s where it gets interesting. Six coaches said they wouldn’t do it because they couldn’t look at themselves in the mirror or because they wouldn’t knowingly break a rule, regardless of the outcome.

Most everyone else?

The rationale went like this: “You can’t coach him,” one coach explained. “He’d always have something over you, so how do you make him practice hard? How do you make him go to class?”

Or they pointed to strict liability, which means a head coach can be fired for the transgression of an assistant, or new contractual clauses as deterrents.

“A lot of universities now have clauses where, if you’re found guilty of a major violation, you have to pay for any costs incurred from the investigation,” a coach said. “You start adding up lawyer costs and that will stop people.”

Are rules being broken here this week at Peach Jam?

The simple answer: Yes. The more complicated: Define “rules.”

Only two coaches thought something truly nefarious was happening on the Georgia/South Carolina border.

“I may bump into a coach at a hotel and say hello,” said one, “but I also know there are people who purposely stay in a hotel because a team is there. That’s shady.”

“Are there meetings going on in hotels right now? Absolutely. The deals and plans are being hatched.”

Everyone else thought it was of the minor violation type — i.e., saying hello to a recruit in the hallway or his parents in a restaurant.

However, the silly bump rule can get downright dirty if taken to the extreme. Most of the NCAA reps are women, and women can’t go into men’s rooms. There’s a real paranoia that some coaches are following prospects or their coaches or parents into the restrooms to broker deals.

“I don’t know. I’ve never won a recruit in the bathroom,” one coach said. “Maybe I need to pee more.”

How often during the recruitment of a player does someone — a coach, a parent, someone else — ask for something in return? How does it happen?

Here’s where it really gets ugly. This hasn’t happened to every coach (12 said they’ve faced it directly), but all 20 of them know it goes on.

While at tournaments, coaches attempt to evaluate but often run into people with their hands out.

“It happened to me this morning,” one coach said. “I had a guy try to hand me a résumé, get them a job.”

Sometimes it’s subtle; sometimes it’s overt, but the implication is understood — if you want to recruit my player/son, you’ll need to take care of me first.

“It will start off as, ‘You know, he’s had a part-time job and now that he’s going to college, I won’t have that income … what can you do to help me?”’ one coach said. “Or it’s, ‘I’ve never missed one of his games. How am I going to afford to travel to see him play now?”’

“I almost cringe when I have a job opening,” another coach said. “Here it comes. I used to get calls from other coaches. Now it’s AAU coaches, trying to place their guys.”

No one admitted to completing the transaction, yet all 20 said they lost a player because they chose not to complete the transaction.

“I think a lot of times they’re just floating it out there, see if you’ll bite,” another coach said. “But you know what? If you don’t, someone else might.”

What is the biggest problem facing college basketball?

Finally, 100 percent consensus: It’s agents and runners. Not only are they sullying the game, but they’re also changing the way players look at their college careers.

That’s no news flash. Agents have long been considered the boogeyman of college athletics. What’s interesting? How they’re doing business:

• Loans or lines of credit: “Say you’ve got a top-10 kid but you don’t have a lot of money,” one coach explained. “The agent will get a line of credit through his financial adviser for you in your name. When your kid goes pro, you pay it back.”

• Prepaid debit cards: Slightly different than a loan, these allow an agent to offer a constant stream of cash by giving a prospect or a prospect’s family member a card with a cash value that can be constantly stuffed with more money, not unlike an actual bank account. The kicker: As of now, the NCAA has no way of tracking the transaction.

“That’s the latest one I’ve heard,” said one coach.

• Tying in to a summer league program: Numerous coaches said that agents now have ties to specific summer league teams and that the people serving as coaches are actually already agents’ runners.

Another coach, who recently coached a top-five draft pick, said that every agent who came to sign his player offered the same thing: “If you sign with me, I’ll deliver you this guy and that guy. Every single one of them is tied to an AAU team. Every one. They cook the deal with the AAU coach. He gets the kid on campus and then cuts a cut.”

• Hiring parents as “consultants”: Shoe companies sponsor virtually every summer league team. The team wears the shoe company’s gear and plays in the shoe company’s sanctioned events.

“I’ve heard of shoe companies hiring parents at ridiculous salaries as their consultants,” one coach said. “Parents are making a big comeback. They look at their children as property or dollar signs, not children. They all see the big cashout.”

The big cashout, of course, is the NBA, the albatross hanging around many a coach’s neck. Hemmed in by the league’s age limit, many coaches are wondering what exactly they’re doing for a living.

“Parents are making a big comeback. They look at their children as property or dollar signs, not children.

“We don’t coach anymore,” one coach said. “This job isn’t about coaching. It’s about acquiring talent.”

“What’s happening at Kentucky, all these one-and-dones, that’s not good for our game,” another added.

Indeed, many coaches thought that the one-and-done rule has diminished the value of a college career — even a one-year college career. They point to players who are more concerned with their individual stats or who are so preoccupied with their future, they aren’t paying attention to their present.

“I told a kid recently, ‘If you say NBA one more time I’m walking out the door,”’ a coach said. “If you’re good enough, you’ll leave after one year or two years or three years. I’m here to talk to you about coming to college and playing for me. I had six kids leave early. The ones who were all-in went [top 10]; the ones who had one foot out the door went late.”

Do you have faith in the NCAA to monitor and control college basketball?

Sort of.

All but three coaches thought the NCAA was at least trying to get a handle on the problems of college basketball. The catch? No one thought it could succeed.

“They’re trying,” said one coach, echoing the sentiments of the majority. “But no matter what the rule, people are going to cheat and the problem is, the best of the best, you’re never going to catch them.”

The coaches interviewed didn’t seem to have a whole lot of confidence in the NCAA.

Coaches pointed to an unfair numbers advantage — more coaches than NCAA investigators — and a savvier coaching fraternity as the top problems.

And others thought the organization was little more than a bureaucratic hypocrisy.

“The NCAA is stealing money from television and they don’t want to kill the golden goose,” one said. “Look at the people on the NCAA committees. The guys who are doing things the right way, they aren’t on the NCAA committees. Why is that?”

There’s also an interesting gender dynamic at work. As noted earlier, almost all of the NCAA investigators are women and they are policing a man’s game. That doesn’t go unnoticed by the coaches, nor does it help the investigators get taken seriously all the time.

Along with the coach who called the women, “the gestapettes,” another said, “If the NCAA was serious, they’d hire someone who knew what they were doing, not these women out here trying to get a husband.”

Are you optimistic/pessimistic about the game?

Mixed bag here. Most coaches (15 of 20) thought the game was more scrutinized and regulated than it’s ever been and believe that the sport is on its way to redemption. Yet even they concede there are major problems with college basketball’s image and its actions.

“I think there are more good than bad out there,” one coach said. “But if you keep saying something, people believe it and we keep saying it. Things have been going on for 50 years and they’ll be going on 50 years from now, but we make it seem like it’s the worst it’s ever been now. I don’t think so. I don’t know if the game has ever been better or the competition has ever been better.”

Others, however, were far more pessimistic.

They see coaches perceived as rulebreakers being rehired — and the NCAA, in their opinion, is doing little to stop them.

“I sometimes wonder, ‘Can I survive in this profession without compromising who I am?”’ one said. “I’m not sure about that answer and it really disappoints me.”

Added another: “I know this: I’m glad I’m not 40 and just getting started in this business. I can see the light at the end of the tunnel, but I would say I’m a little more pessimistic about things than I was a few years ago. It just seems like we can’t stop it. The bad guys keep winning.”